Technology consumers, producers, and
regulators seem to be engaged in a perpetual struggle for control
over individuals' technology. For companies, control provides
business opportunities, allows for easy-to-use software, and
encourages customer loyalty. For regulators, control allows them to
enforce order. For consumers, control provides privacy and freedom to
do what they will with their belongings. This struggle is central to
operating system preference, with Apple on the company-controlled end
of the spectrum and Linux on the other end. This struggle is the core
concern behind the NSA surveillance scandals, a significant barrier
to effective enforcement of copyright law, and a major motivation
behind the open-source movement. Just lately, Valve has opted to try
and disrupt the status quo of company control in the console gaming
market by manufacturing an open-source, fully hackable gamingconsole. I don't claim to know where the optimum balance of control
is. But we live in an age where information is power, so the question
of who controls our information is critical.
No comments:
Post a Comment